Wednesday, July 24, 2019

Dr. Robert Epstein on Big Tech Censorship


CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
http://www.protectourliberty.org
Other suggested reading and viewing on being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States:
1.  A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.
2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.
3. Read this essay regarding the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something.  All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ 
4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/
5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/
6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts:  http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html  or  https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts 
7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8  and  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ
8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Obama Citizenship Facts

Obama Citizenship Facts and
Obama Birth Certificate Facts


The lawsuit called for below has now been filed. See the announcement by Atty Apuzzo regarding a new case: "Kerchner et al v Obama et al".
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-case-filed-kerchner-et-al-v-obama.html


It is now time, and legally very "ripe", to sue Congress itself in federal district courts for committing an "unconstitutional act" by confirming Obama as he is ineligible under our Constitution to serve as the President and Commander-in-Chief of our military since he is not a "natural born citizen". Congress itself did not do its due diligence and duty to uphold their oath and to uphold their role in our system of government of laws and defend our Constitution, the supreme law of our nation. They ignored the Constitution and the "natural born citizen" clause therein. Lawsuits should be filed now against Congress in all nine federal district courts seeking a stay of the swearing in and inauguration until hearings our held in federal district courts and/or SCOTUS to determine of the exact citizenship status of Obama. Obama is ineligible to serve. He is not a natural born citizen of the USA. Congress failed to do its duty to uphold and protect our Constitution by allowing a usurper to become the President-Elect. Now we the people have standing and the right to sue Congress for acting unconstitutionally. We the people must now sue in federal courts to protect and uphold the Constitution. The political process is now over and the politicians and political parties have failed in following the Constitution, the supreme law of the land. The matter of Obama's lack of natural born citizenship is now legally ripe for we the people to sue. See this letter to The Federalist Society: http://www.scribd.com/doc/9874122/

Obama's father was never a U.S. citizen. Thus, Obama is not a "natural born" citizen. When Obama was born he was not a "natural born" citizen since both parents of a child must be citizens at the time of birth of the child in order for the child to be a "natural born" citizen, in addition to the requirement that the child must be born in the USA. Obama may be a "native born" citizen depending on the evidence in Hawaii since his mother was a citizen. "Native born" is NOT synonymous with "natural born". Obama can never be considered a "natural born" citizen no matter where he was born because his father was not a U.S. citizen. Both parents must be citizens at the time of birth of the child in the USA for the child to be a "natural born" citizen per our Constitution's framers intent. The "divided loyalties" concerns of the framers of a person who is selected to serve as our President and Commander-in-Chief of our military comes into play. Thus the framers required a "natural born" citizen only mandate in the U.S. Constitution for the Office of President and Commander-in-Chief of our military. http://www.youtube.com/v/x452t_07QYo&hl=en&fs=1


"Natural born citizenship" is defined in the 250 year old scholarly book, "Law of Nations", written in 1758, decades before our Constitution and was used as a scholarly reference by our U.S. Constitution's framers. Some excerpts, "... natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. ... I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country". See more here: http://countryfirst.bravehost.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=1169 Also see this chart which shows who is and who is not a "natural born citizen" depending on whom your parents are and where you are born: http://countryfirst.bravehost.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=105&t=1467



FACT: Obama has NOT provided a certified copy of an original, typed, vault copy, long-form, birth certificate, signed by his mother and delivering doctor with the name of the hospital thereon, to be used to conclusively prove one of two key elements used in determining his "natural born" citizenship status per the U.S. Constitution, i.e., where he was born.


Being a "natural born citizen" is required to serve in the office of the Presidency under our U.S. Constitution. Obama has only produced a computer-generated, short-form, registration of birth form called a "Certification of Live Birth", (aka COLB). And some question the genuineness of that proffered document. But note, it does not say "Certificate" it says "Certification". Thus it is not a Birth "Certificate". And this is a key difference in the discussion of what Obama has proffered and what he has not. Only the actual long form original typed version signed by the mother and delivering doctor and/or other witnesses is a Birth "Certificate" under Hawaiian law and to the courts. In Hawaii that document is named "Certificate of Live Birth". Note, the change in the one word, "Certificate" of Live Birth (aka long form Birth Certificate), not "Certification" of Live Birth (aka COLB, the computer generated short form), which is what Obama has proffered thus far. And a short form "COLB" is not a conclusive legal document to prove birth and is not acceptable to most courts for proof of birth facts. A short form "COLB" shows a birth was registered. But not by whom and exactly how. Nor does it provide the facts necessary to trace the facts to independent third party witnesses or facts, such as the name of the hospital or doctor. See videos below for more on that. So, Obama has proved his birth was registered in Hawaii but has not proven conclusively that he was physically born there, nor what exactly is stated or not stated on the long form document filled out in 1961, if one exists. Read the next paragraph as to why.

Registration of live births under the vague laws in Hawaii in 1961 is not proof of birth in Hawaii at all. Read the laws on the books in Hawaii for registration of births in 1961.
This is what the law actually allowed in 1961.

"Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child."

See links below for more about the relevant Hawaiian law. A computer generated Certification of Live Birth (COLB) issued in Hawaii is not acceptable to even their own courts as conclusive proof of birth in Hawaii. Under Hawaiian law in 1961, a child could be born anywhere in the world and have the birth registered in Hawaii by the mother after the birth, with true or false information, without any third party independent verification of said "facts" entered on the form by the mother, upon her returning to Hawaii using this law on the books in 1961.
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.htm
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/why_the_barack_obama_birth_cer.html

Read this simple, straight forward, comparative report about what Obama has proffered as evidence of "natural born citizenship" and what he has NOT provided:
http://www.peoplespassions.org/peoplesvoice/Birth_Certificate.htm

Reference proof of natural born citizenship, a computer generated form (aka COLB) can be easily PhotoShop'd, altered, or forged. Such a simple registration record could be retro-actively filed in Hawaii in 1961 as a post birth event registration after birth of a child, with the birth not even having occurred in Hawaii. No one checked these retro-active registrations in HI at that time which were done by simply signing an affidavit that the facts are true. The mother or grandparents could have done this retro-actively upon the mother's return to give the infant child citizenship. This was a possible cover up at the time by the mother and grandmother. The short form data is then being abstracted from a false, delayed registration of birth, filed with false information by the mother with a simple affidavit with no non-family member, independent witnesses. That was permitted under Hawaii law in 1961. A mother could register the birth of her child upon returning to Hawaii after the actual birth elsewhere. But who knew this child would grow up an run for President and that someone would dig into the records to find the truth, as is now being done. Such a case would explain the stalling, delaying, and obfuscating tactics Obama and his lawyers are engaging in. They don't want the true nature of the birth records registered in Hawaii by his mother and maternal grandmother revealed.

FACT: A qualification per the U.S. Constitution for a person to serve as the President of the U.S. is that they must be a "natural born citizen". And there are several categories of citizenship in the USA: Naturalized, Derivative, Statutory, Native Born, and Natural Born.


Obama may or may not be Native Born depending on the validity of his paternal grandmother's statement in Kenya, and the sealed hospital records in Mombasa, Kenya, but he is certainly not "natural born" since for that term both his parents must be U.S. citizens (of any category) when he was born. And per statements made in his own campaign's website, and in his books, Obama has admitted his father was a British Subject when Obama was born. Obama's father never at any time was a U.S. citizen. Thus Obama is NOT a "Natural Born Citizen (NBC)" of the U.S. under our Constitution's framer's intent. And thus he cannot serve as our President under our Constitution. Defining "natural born citizen", a dissertation on that subject:
http://federalistblog.us/2008/11/natural-born_citizen_defined.html

Obama will apparently have several hurdles to cross to prove he is a "natural born citizen". First he has to conclusively prove he was born in Hawaii. And again, a computer generated birth registration form, aka the COLB type document proffered by Obama's campaign, is not sufficient evidence for most court cases, let alone to assume the office of Presidency of the U.S. For more about Obama's birth certificate and citizenship issue, below are links to web pages which explain what a "vault copy" of an original birth certificate is and an example of what one looks like from circa the time frame of interest in Hawaii. Obama has NOT provided such a document and refuses to do so.
http://www.peoplespassions.org/peoplesvoice/Birth_Certificate.htm

For the time period in question, the originals were generally typed or hand printed, and will have the signature of the mother on it, the name and signature of the delivering doctor, the name of the hospital, as well as other witnesses to the birth, if any. Obama refuses to provide a certified "vault copy" of his original birth registration in Hawaii. This web page explains and provides exhibits and examples what Obama has provided and what he has not, to date. Also and very importantly note that to date, Obama has NOT personally said in public, "I am a natural born citizen of the U.S. per the U.S. Constitution", and produced a certified "vault copy" of the long form, original birth certificate signed by his mother and the doctor and showing the hospital record where he was born. Why has he not done that? Why has he not released his college records from Occidental in CA, Columbia in NY, and Harvard in MA? Why is he hiding behind his lawyers on this?

FACT: To serve as a U.S. Senator the person must be a U.S. Citizen.


The problem Obama has with that issue is whether his step-father, who moved the family to Indonesia after marrying his mother, legally "adopted" him or "acknowledged" him as his son in Indonesia with the mother's concurrence, thereby renouncing his U.S. citizenship while living in Indonesia. To get into schools in Indonesia at that time the child had to be an Indonesian citizen, and not a U.S. citizen. If his U.S. citizenship was renounced, it would make him no longer a U.S. citizen at all, unless he re-applied for naturalization upon return to the U.S. This is discussed in the Berg vs. Obama case brief to SCOTUS. See: [url]http://www.obamacrimes.com[/url] for the details and the entire Berg brief and supplemental filings. It is also alleged in that brief that when Obama was about age 20, c1981/1982, that he traveled to Pakistan with a college buddy and student from Pakistan who he met Occidental College. At that time period U.S. citizens could not travel to Pakistan. Thus he must have used some other documentation to get into Pakistan. It is alleged that he used an Indonesian passport that he had retained from his youth and kept it up to date which documented him as an Indonesian citizen, and not a U.S. citizen. Obama has refused to produce any of his passports data from that c1981/1982 time period. Given the poor relations between the U.S. and Pakistan in that time period, he likely traveled to Pakistan on that Indonesian passport, which said he was an Indonesian citizen, which he likely was per accounts and records in Indonesia. His school records in Indonesian say his parents their declared him an Indonesian student. Images of that school document have been published online declaring him an Indonesian citizen of the religion of Islam. And some say when he later enrolled in Occidental College, he declared himself a foreign student and citizen of Indonesia to get generous aide available for foreign citizens at that college. Obama will not release those college records either. He is taking the same stance with his college records as he is taking with his birth records and also with his medical records too. Lots to think about. But his renounced U.S. citizenship by his mother and step-father when in Indonesia, and traveling as an adult on the Indonesian passport, and/or probably making other statements as an adult of being an Indonesian citizen in other records in the past such as college records, he would thus be knowingly acknowledging his renounced U.S. citizenship, and that would disqualify (DQ) him as a "natural born citizen" for sure, and in fact he would not even be a citizen at all at his point. And if he is not legally a U.S. citizen at all, he cannot serve as a U.S. Senator, and all that time in the Senate was done under fraudulent status too. Berg also then further argues in his brief to SCOTUS that Obama may even be an illegal alien in the U.S. under current law if he cannot prove he was ever naturalized upon returning to Hawaii from Indonesia. Again, lots more to think about regarding Obama's citizenship status.

ACTIVE CASES AT SCOTUS:



LINK TO LATEST NEWS FOR ATTY ORLY TAITZ of CA (LIGHTFOOT v BOWEN) CASE:
Atty Orly Taitz blog site: http://drorly.blogspot.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Docket for this case: http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a524.htm

LINK TO LATEST NEWS FOR ATTY BERG of PA (BERG v OBAMA , DNC, FEC, et al) CASE:
Atty Berg's website: http://www.obamacrimes.com
U.S. Supreme Court Docket for this case: http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

DENIED CASES NO LONGER ACTIVE AT SCOTUS:



LINK TO LATEST NEWS FOR WROTNOWSKI, PRO SE, of CT (WROTNOWSKI v BYSIEWICZ-SOS of CT) CASE:
See Atty Donofrio's blog for discussion of this case: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Docket for this case: http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a469.htm

LINK TO LATEST NEWS FOR ATTY DONOFRIO of NJ (DONOFRIO v WELLS-SOS of NJ) CASE:
Atty. Leo C. Donofrio's newest Blog Site at WordPress.com : http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
Atty. Leo C. Donofrio's former BlogSpot.com Site (flagged due to complaints by O-Bots): http://thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com/
Atty. Leo C. Donofrio's original TextBlog .org Site (attacked by the O-Bots and shut down for days. Now back up but not current.): http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/
U.S. Supreme Court Docket for this case: http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm



Ron Polarik, PhD, document and image expert, states in report and video the Obama's online birth records at the Obama campaign website and FactCheck.org and Snopes.com, etc., are all forged. Note: "Dr. Polarik" is a pseudonym and his identity is obscured in this video to protect his real identity. See video here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qz58SxMhP4Y

Sandra Lines, Forensic Document Examiner, confirms the online Certification of Live Birth (COLB) images proffered by Obama are forgeries:
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/executedsandralinesdeclaration_1.pdf

Watch these Youtube videos in order listed for more on what Obama has proffered as evidence and what he has not provided and the concerns of why we need to learn more:

http://www.youtube.com/v/SIsQJNTvlUE&hl=en&fs=1

http://www.youtube.com/v/oVoJZEdM0K4&hl=en&fs=1

http://www.youtube.com/v/-MWqIwXMBWQ&hl=en&fs=1

http://www.youtube.com/v/MIVO8MZYXo8&hl=en&fs=1

"PC" correct verbiage of recent times is found in the Obama supplied short form COLB. This indicates to several document examiners that Obama's short-form Certification of Live Birth (COLB) document is likely a fraud and/or that the registration was registered much later than 1961. This reminds me of similar problems with Obama's Selective Service System (SSS) draft registration record. It has been found by document examiners to have been likely created in 2008 and back-dated into the SSS data base to make it look like it was done in 1980.

Ron Polarik, PhD, document and image expert, states in his report and video that Obama's online birth records at the Obama campaign website and FactCheck.org and Snopes.com, etc., are all forged. Note: "Dr. Polarik" is a pseudonym and his identity is obscured in this video to protect his real identity. See details and video of Dr. Polarik's work at these links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qz58SxMhP4Y

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2136816/posts


Sandra Lines, Forensic Document Examiner, confirms the online Certification of Live Birth (COLB) images proffered by Obama are forgeries:
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/executedsandralinesdeclaration_1.pdf

Indications of possible more recent registration of Obama's birth in Hawaii:
http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2008/08/proof-barack-obama-birth-certificate-is.html

Charges of fraudulent back dated Draft Registration of Obama:
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html


And, the birth announcement placed in the local community newspaper is also false and misleading:
http://countryfirst.bravehost.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=249&p=612#p612


WHERE you were born and WHO BOTH YOUR PARENTS WERE are the two key elements to determining if you are a natural born citizen of the USA. With Obama, too many questions remain unanswered. Too many allegations of falsified, back dated documents. Not enough primary source, independently verified, conclusive, original, long form, legal evidence of where he was actually born has been provided. Why has Obama never publicly and personally addressed these charges and issues himself? Is he afraid of being later criminally charged personally with false representations and perjury? Is that why he is always hiding behind staff and lawyers when it comes to answering such questions? It reminds me of the Clinton and Monica story and Bill's carefully selected words, parsing of sentences, stalling, and obfuscating. Where there is smoke there likely is fire. Obama could have addressed this long ago. All he had to do and still could do is state in public, "I am a natural born citizen of the U.S. per the U.S. Constitution" and produce a certified copy of the "vault copy" of the long form, original birth certificate filled out in 1961 showing the mother's signature, the delivering doctor's signature, name of the hospital, and any other witnesses, if any. These facts could then be traced to the original hospital and its records. That would end the debate as to one element of the two elements defining natural born citizenship, i.e., WHERE you were born. Why he has not done so, something so simple to do, given he wants the highest office in our government, is the driving reason of our concern. He must produce the original long form birth certificate so its genuineness can be confirmed by document experts and so the traceable facts on it, such as the delivering doctor's name and the named hospital and its records, which can then be independently verified against the local hospital, doctor, or medical records of the birth.

What can you do to help? These groups needs your help. If you have access to a computer, and know how to use Google.com and other search engines online, you can volunteer an hour or maybe two per day to help them with their project, please contact them and visit their "What I Can Do / How You Can Help Pages":
http://americamustknow.com

http://www.freedommarch.org/Volunteer.html#Legal_and_Donofrio

http://www.democratic-disaster.com/

http://saveourrights.wikia.com/wiki/Save_Our_Rights

Mountain Publius Goat

http://www.obamacitizenshipfacts.org

Some useful links:
The U.S. Constitution Online: http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
The Obama File Website: http://theobamafile.com
The Obama Time Line to Power: http://www.colony14.net/id41.html

P.S.: According to people's accounts in Kenya when Obama was first elected to the U.S. Senate, it was common knowledge that Obama was born in Kenya:
[b]Now we have some more breaking news on Obama's Kenyan birth made by the Kenyan Ambassador to the U.S. on 21 Nov 2008:[/b]
Obama Born in Kenya Acknowledged by Kenyan Ambassador. Here is a YouTube replay of the radio show call to the Kenyan Ambassador. Listen to it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH4GX3Otf14
Original show complete show tape at radio station:
http://my.wrif.com/mim/?p=916

Add the above acknowledgments by the Kenyan Ambassador to the U.S. to the prior videos and voice recordings of his Kenyan paternal grandmother's own words such as these below. You decide.
What it makes me decide is that I definitely want to see the long form, original birth certificate filed in Hawaii to see what it says and doesn't say. Barack needs to pony up and release it.
http://www.youtube.com/v/-4FqVRWgrNw&hl=en&fs=1 http://www.youtube.com/v/JlFc4wCpvSo&hl=en&fs=1
Update 27 Nov 2008: Kenyan Ambassador says he does not know if Obama was born in the U.S. He says U.S. government should investigate where he was born and if necessary request the sealed records in both Kenya and the U.S. I agree with his suggestion. Read the whole article here:
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82060

P.S.S.: All Kenyans Know What We Americans Refuse to Recognize: http://www.youtube.com/v/xmO4-gd8oAU&hl=en&fs=1